Nsf iis program

Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing. Full proposals submitted via Grants. The complete text of the NSF Grants. Paper copies of the Grants.

In determining which method to utilize in the electronic preparation and submission of the proposal, please note the following:. Collaborative Proposals. Proposal Titles: Proposal titles must begin with an acronym that indicates a core or cross-cutting technical area or curriculum development activities as indicated below.

This acronym should be followed with a colon, then the title. If you submit a proposal as part of a set of collaborative proposals, the title of the proposal should begin with the acronym that indicates the core or cross-cutting technical area, followed by a colon, then "Collaborative Research" followed by a colon, and the title. Project Summary: All projects submitted to this competition must provide up to four key words at the end of the Project Summary.

These key words should describe the main scientific areas explored in the proposal. Key words should be prefaced with "Key Words" followed by a colon and each key word separated by semi-colons.

Key words should be of the type used to describe research in a journal submission. They should be put at the end of the project summary and might appear, for example, as Key Words: data mining; artificial intelligence; social implications of IT; information privacy. Proposals that incorporate curriculum development activities within a research project, but do not focus exclusively on them, should briefly summarize the curriculum development activities in the project summary.

Up to three additional pages are permitted in the Project Description for this purpose only, allowing a maximum of 18 pages. Proposals that incorporate curriculum development activities within a research project, but do not focus exclusively on them, should summarize the curriculum development activities in a separate section of the Project Description entitled "Curriculum Development Activities.

This list should be numbered and include in this order Full name, Organization s , and Role in the project, with each item separated by a semi-colon. Each person listed should start a new numbered line.

For example:. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact s listed in Section VIII of this solicitation. Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal.

Before using Grants. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants. The Grants. In addition, the NSF Grants. For Grants. The AOR must then sign and submit the application to Grants. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal.

These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional.

Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board NSB -approved merit review criteria: intellectual merit and the broader impacts of the proposed effort.

In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities. The two NSB-approved merit review criteria are listed below. The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which the reviewer is qualified to make judgements.

What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer individual or team to conduct the project? If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.

To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity?

Is there sufficient access to resources? What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups e. To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships?

Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? Failure to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for all identified PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.

Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants individual and organizational , publications, and other specific products and impacts of the project. Submission of the report via Research. The project outcomes report also must be prepared and submitted using Research. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project.

Please note that the program contact information is current at the time of publishing. The NSF website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates including contact information , programs and funding opportunities. Use of this website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged.

In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery system designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Grants Conferences.

Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each time new publications are issued that match their identified interests. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this mechanism.

Further information on Grants. The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in all fields of science and engineering. NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2, colleges, universities, K school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US.

The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic research. NSF receives approximately 55, proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11, are funded.

In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic research stations.

The Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level. The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of , as amended.

The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members.

Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a valid Office of Management and Budget OMB control number.

The OMB control number for this collection is Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions.

Send comments regarding the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:.

Suzanne H. The revisions include: The program description for Robust Intelligence has been revised. Broadening Participation in Computing plans are strongly encouraged for Medium and Large proposals, and approved plans are required before award. Proposers are requested not to request start dates between July 2 and September 30 of a given year.

Eligibility requirements for PIs, co-PIs, and senior personnel are clarified. Placement of keywords in the Project Summary is clarified. Evaluation plans are encouraged. Cognizant Program Officer s : Please note that the following information is current at the time of publishing.

Special Instructions for International Branch Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal includes funding to be provided to an international branch campus of a US institution of higher education including through use of subawards and consultant arrangements , the proposer must explain the benefit s to the project of performance at the international branch campus, and justify why the project activities cannot be performed at the US campus.

Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research labs, professional societies and similar organizations in the U. Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization: There are no restrictions or limits.

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions A. Full Proposals submitted via Research. Full Proposals submitted via Grants. Budgetary Information Cost Sharing Requirements: Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited. Due Dates Submission Window Date s due by 5 p. Cyber-Human Systems CHS In a world in which computers and networks are increasingly ubiquitous, computing, information, and computation play a central role in how humans work, learn, live, discover, and communicate.

In this ongoing pilot phase, CISE will work with each PI team following merit review and prior to making an award to ensure that plans are meaningful and include concrete metrics for success. PIs of Medium and Large proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to consider this eventual requirement as they develop their proposals, and to include one- to three-page descriptions of their planned BPC activities under Supplementary Documents in their submissions. PIs submitting to the Small size class should note that CISE intends to conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of the above approach and determine appropriate next steps, including potential further expansion of this effort in future years.

PIs of Small proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to include plans, or begin preparing to include plans, for broadening participation activities in their proposals. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing. The Prepare New Proposal setup will prompt you for the program solicitation number. Full proposals submitted via Grants.

The complete text of the NSF Grants. Paper copies of the Grants. In determining which method to utilize in the electronic preparation and submission of the proposal, please note the following: Collaborative Proposals. Supplementary Documents: In the Supplementary Documents section, upload the following information where relevant: List of Project Personnel and Partner Institutions Note: In collaborative proposals, the lead institution should provide this information for all participants : Provide current, accurate information for all personnel and institutions involved in the project.

See Chapter II. Submission Checklist: In an effort to assist proposal preparation, the following checklists are provided as a reminder of the items that should be checked before submitting a proposal to this solicitation. For Small proposals: The proposal title should comply with the requirements under Proposal Preparation Instructions above. A Collaboration Plan up to 2 pages may be provided as a Supplementary Document.

If provided, the Collaboration Plan should include all institutions participating, not a separate plan for each institution. For Medium proposals: The proposal title should comply with the requirements under Proposal Preparation Instructions above. RWR If there is more than one investigator, a collaboration plan up to 2 pages must be provided as a Supplementary Document, even if all investigators are affiliated with the same institution.

The Collaboration Plan should include all institutions participating, not a separate plan for each institution. For Large proposals: The proposal title should comply with the requirements under Proposal Preparation Instructions above.

RWR A Collaboration Plan up to 2 pages must be provided as a Supplementary Document, even if all investigators are affiliated with the same institution. Budgetary Information Cost Sharing: Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

Other Budgetary Limitations: Budgets must comply with the range limitations specified for each project class. For Proposals Submitted Via Grants. Merit Review Principles and Criteria The National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates new knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across all areas of science and engineering research and education. Please be advised that, depending on the specified due date, the guidelines contained in NSF may apply to proposals submitted in response to this funding opportunity.

HCC addresses novel:. Note that projects that simply apply existing HCC techniques to particular domains of science and engineering are more appropriate for funding opportunities issued by the NSF programs cognizant for those domains. Most proposals focused on human-robot interaction HRI should be submitted to the Foundational Research in Robotics Robotics program; however, HCC may be more appropriate when the human behavior is the core research thrust and pre-existing robotic technology is used.

In the News. What's Happening. For the press. Learn more about the project. Please be advised that, depending on the specified due date, the guidelines contained in NSF may apply to proposals submitted in response to this funding opportunity. Information Integration and Informatics III supports innovative research on computational methods for the full data lifecycle, from collection through archiving and knowledge discovery, to maximize the utility of information resources to science and engineering and broadly to society.

III projects range from formal theoretical research to those that advance data-intensive applications of scientific, engineering, or societal importance. Research areas within III include:. Note that projects that simply apply existing III techniques to particular domains of science and engineering are more appropriate for funding opportunities issued by the NSF programs cognizant for those domains.

In the News. What's Happening.